NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

Why we're not fearing the loss of moving parts in new cars

Switching from mechanical to electrical technology isn't a bad thing for people who love to drive. It's making driving easier and more fuel efficient.

By Douglas Newcomb Aug 22, 2013 6:54AM

Even though some car enthusiasts lament the creep of technology into cars, electronics replacing mechanical parts are nothing new. Think of power steering and how it has helped made driving easier and safer for decades.


More recently, electric power steering that uses electric motors to assist driver input instead of a hydraulic pump, as with earlier systems, has become common. EPS also saves fuel, because it runs independently of the engine's power and allows for start-stop systems that shut off the engine at traffic lights.


But regardless of whether power steering was hydraulically or electrically assisted, drivers continued to have a direct mechanical connection to the front wheels. That is, until the first "steering-by-wire" system was recently introduced on a production vehicle, the 2014 Infiniti Q50.


This means that the mechanical linkage connecting the front wheels to the steering wheels has been replaced with electronics. The advantages of steering-by-wire systems include advancements in stability control and that the steering ratio can be infinitely varied.


But such arrangements also mean that there's no physical feedback or tactile "steering feel" for the driver, which is anathema to enthusiasts. Some complain that electronics are more prone to failure, although a fail-safe system on the Infiniti Q50 relies on a good ol' mechanical linkage if that happens. And remember the last time you flew on a commercial airline? The pilots were using steering-by-wire to control the plane.


Such systems likely are just the beginning of electronics replacing critical mechanical functions and parts on cars, and in a more obvious fashion than steering-by-wire.

For example, Tesla wasn’t able to completely eliminate the door handles on the Model S for improved aerodynamics on the all-electric luxury sedan. Instead, the handles are flush with the body and pop out only when the driver approaches with the key. But Tesla does want to ditch the side mirrors on the Model X crossover that it plans to launch late next year.




The original Model X concept had cameras built into the doors that fed video displays inside the car. Tesla said that removing the side mirrors would reduce wind resistance and therefore increase efficiency and battery range. But the idea doesn’t adhere to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 111 regulating rearview mirrors on cars.

 

When the Model X appeared at the Detroit Auto Show in January of this year, traditional side mirrors had replaced the cameras. But Tesla’s head designer, Franz von Holzhausen, recently said that the company is "still in talks with authorities to get the necessary permissions" to replace the side mirrors with cameras.


This isn’t an original idea, of course, or the first time technology from an automaker has gotten out ahead of the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, which oversees automotive safety regulations. Audi’s R8 e-tron supercar concept included a 7.7-inch widescreen LED in place of the traditional glass rearview mirror.




The LED displays images from an always-on, wide-angle camera in a heated mount in the rear bumper. Audi used a special LED created by Samsung that provides a wider viewing angle than a traditional mirror does, and it doesn't need a backlight, so uses less power. Audi adapted the digital rearview mirror from its LeMans-winning R18 e-tron prototype.


Volkswagen also got rid of the side mirrors on the XL1, an ultra-efficient diesel-hybrid supercar that debuted at this year’s Geneva Auto Show and replaced them with two door-mounted cameras a lá Tesla. A writer for Automotive News drove the XL1 around VW's hometown of Wolfsburg, Germany, and reported that "relying on cameras was unsettling at first, but it worked fine" and pointed out "how useful night-vision side mirrors could be."



While some auto enthusiasts almost reflexively decry the advance of technology such as drive-by-wire and driver assist systems that take over in case of an accident, the majority of car owners embrace electronics if such systems make their time behind the wheel safer and easier.


Plus, you can't stop progress -- and in my opinion, that's a good thing. Otherwise, we'd still be wrestling with non-assisted steering.


Doug Newcomb has been covering car technology for more than 20 years for outlets ranging from Rolling Stone to Edmunds.com. In 2008, he published his first book, "Car Audio for Dummies" (Wiley). He lives and drives in Hood River, Ore., with his wife and two kids, who share his passion for cars and car technology, especially driving and listening to music.

25Comments
Aug 22, 2013 11:08AM
avatar

i used to pull 2 or 3 useless parts out of my vw jetta everytime I did a project, car ran even better without them, dont know why the company would put them in.. just to add weight and cost to the car,..

thought that was what this was talking about, instead they are talking about adding a bunch of computers and computerized part where a mechanism once did the job..

 

I love computers, but I have to a agree with Annatar on this one, now you are not only talking about fixing your car, but programming it as well, and you know its all going to be prorietary.. I made comments about that when msn did the story the so called "apple car" or "icar" or whatever.. I think if you try the "closed garden" as apple calls it or "highly proprietrary" from Annatar, approach to automobile software then just like apple products you will pay a premium.

Aug 25, 2013 6:44PM
avatar
I've been hearing rumors of electric unitized air conditioning for years, but haven't actually seen it.

Wondering if anyone is using it yet? 

Seems that would be useful in hybrids and electrics. In others it would get the direct load off the engine. It would also make the ac more efficient as the compressor would run at a constant speed instead of engine speed, and would not add heat to an idling engine.

The original concept was to have a "sealed" unit, similar to a window unit in a house. When there was a problem, the entire unit would be removed and exchanged for a new/rebuilt one. No more trapped contamination of components when a compressor fails...
Aug 22, 2013 7:54AM
avatar
"Switching from mechanical to electrical technology isn't a bad thing for people who love to drive."

Only someone who has never cross-compiled, linked and debugged software on a highly secretive, highly proprietary, poorly documented, and even less understood hardware platform could make such an assertion.

The systems you are writing about are extremely complex. They are not easy to work on and require special, custom development environments. The software which controls these systems is extremely complex and error prone. Just omitting one single check of a return code from a function call could mean you lose control of your vehicle and it could cost you your life. The code bases of these embedded systems easily run into tens of millions of lines of inefficient spaghetti code. It is not uncommon to have an embedded system code base with several hundred million lines of code.

Probability and statistics stack most unfavorably against reliability in this case: on so many millions of lines of code, chances that there will be no bugs are equal to playing the lottery. However, chances that such bugs in software could be fatal are high. We have only begun scratching the surface of embedded systems' programming and the computer industry as a whole is especially weak in architecting systems with adequate, let alone good observability. The only piece of widely known and available software which even gives thought to such concepts as self-healing and extensive observability is Solaris, a high-end general purpose OS which is not even embedded system software.

Do not trust these systems. They are extremely fragile and error prone. Debugging them is exorbitantly expensive and time consuming. The solutions are usually hacked together, or the software usually functions on a principle of "patch for a patch of a patch".

"Drive-by-wire and friends" are extremely detrimental.
Aug 24, 2013 1:39PM
avatar
This is a horrible thing. Electronics break more often than mechanical things do and they are 5 times as much to fix. Whoever wrote this is an idiot.
Aug 22, 2013 7:24PM
avatar
Use a monitor(s) in place of mirrors...side mirrors hurt MPG/Aerodynamics a lot !
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
MSN Money

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.