Ford cuts fuel economy estimates on 9 models, faces EPA scrutiny
For the second time in less than a year, Ford has again overstated its EPA numbers.
Ford has cut fuel economy estimates on nine models, marking the second time in less than a year that the automaker has been caught overstating its test results.
The mileage figures of all Ford hybrids and plug-in hybrids from 2013-2014 -- including the Lincoln MKZ Hybrid plus four 2014 Fiesta models -- have come under scrutiny by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Ford said that it found mistakes on its wind tunnel and dynamometer tests, which it uses to calculate fuel economy on the EPA's standardized tests, when engineers were verifying the fuel economy results on a Fusion Hybrid. The company said it then checked all of its cars for potential flaws in an internal audit and released the results to the EPA, which then verified the numbers at its labs in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
“Ford is absolutely committed to delivering top fuel economy and accurate information,” said Alan Mulally, Ford president and CEO, in a statement. “We apologize to our customers and will provide goodwill payments to affected owners. We also are taking steps to improve our processes and prevent issues like this from happening again.”
- Ford, citing EPA loophole, cuts fuel-economy estimate for C-Max
- EPA investigating Ford hybrids for mileage accuracy
- Hyundai, Kia owners sue over exaggerated mileage claims
About 200,000 customers are affected. Dealers won't receive updated fuel economy window labels until next week, and until then, they will be allowed to sell the cars as-is. The EPA said that Ford has 15 days under the law to make the changes and will personally oversee fuel economy tests for "future vehicles." The EPA relies on manufacturers to submit their fuel-economy estimates and verifies only about 15 percent of all new cars every year.
The MKZ Hybrid suffered the worst fuel economy losses, with a drop of 7 and 8 mpg, respectively, from its previous 45 mpg city/45 mpg highway rating. The Fusion Hybrid took a hit from 47/47 mpg to 44/41 mpg, and the C-Max Energi and Fusion Energi gave up two miles each from their former 21-mile estimated electric-only range. The new Fiesta EcoBoost that Ford lauded last year as the most fuel-efficient nonhybrid gas-powered on sale has been stripped of its title. Instead, the title goes to the Mitsubishi Mirage. (The full list of affected models and their previous and current EPA estimates can be found here.)
In August last year, Ford dropped the C-Max EPA rating -- formerly, at the same 47/47 mpg rating as the Fusion Hybrid -- after admitting it used an EPA regulation from 1977 that allows manufacturers to use the same fuel-economy estimates on "vehicles with the same engine, transmission and weight class," according to the EPA.
Ford applied the same EPA test rating it achieved from the larger Fusion Hybrid without testing the C-Max separately. But despite sharing powertrains and similar weights, the two cars are built on entirely separate platforms. The C-Max is a 5-door compact hatch, while the Fusion Hybrid is a conventional 4-door sedan. Ford paid C-Max owners $550 and lessees $325, or what Ford said was the difference in the EPA's estimated five-year fueling costs.
In that same month, Ford dealers began updating powertrain software on 77,000 2013 Ford C-Max, Fusion Hybrid and Lincoln MKZ Hybrid models that Ford said would "provide our customers enhanced on-road fuel-economy satisfaction." That announcement, which promised higher electric speeds and various electronic tweaks, was made in July.
In December 2012, Ford initially fell under EPA scrutiny -- and a host of lawsuits -- after Consumer Reports published an article describing the disappointing fuel economy of the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max. One month earlier, Hyundai and Kia admitted fault in overstating fuel economy for 1.1 million cars -- about 75 total models -- and initiated a lifetime compensation program to its owners.
[Source: Ford via EPA]
we ALL know they ( NOT just Ford, all of them ) write these numbers with criterea and conditions that you and me will never see....
at sea level ....
with pure gasoline...( not this ethenol crap we get stuck with )....
aired UP tires.....
Lightened up cars ( no spare, no full gas tank, etc. )
Low top speed...
So they may truly GET those results once ...but to advertise that all of US can do the same ? ? ?
I've got a 2013 F-150 with the ecoboost and the best I can get at 70 mph is 16 to 17. My average highway is right at 15 to 15.2. I have heard people getting 22 or 23 but after owning my second F-150 since 2010 I find it hard to believe the mileage estimates are correct. I love my truck and wouldn't trade it for another brand but it's thirsty for sure. My wife drives a 2013 Explorer with the Ecoboost 4 cylinder and we've seen a 26 at best and the estimates were 29. So my experience with the Ecoboost is that I am less than impressed with the fuel economy. Both overstated probably as much as 25%.
"... marking the second time in less than a year that the automaker has been caught overstating its test results."
Ford said that it found mistakes on its wind tunnel and dynamometer tests...."
Yes shame on Ford for catching there error and reporting it to the EPA.
EXPLORE NEW CARS
MORE ON MSN AUTOS
ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES
Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.
Have a story idea? Tip us off at firstname.lastname@example.org.