Are Traffic Cameras Dying a Slow Death?
The District of Columbia is adding more cameras to catch traffic offenders, but some states and cities are banning them.
The District of Columbia is doubling down on camera enforcement of its traffic laws: It already uses the devices to catch speeders and red-light runners, and this fall it plans to add them at stop signs, according to reporting by The Washington Post. But high-tech policing is a surprisingly divisive issue; cities such as New York are contemplating it, but others are banning the use of cameras.
Twelve states have prohibited the cameras while 13 others and the District of Columbia use them, according to the Governors Highway Safety Association. Last year, Houston and Los Angeles turned their backs on the technology due to difficulties with enforcement.
The cameras' Achilles heel is that the person driving the car (and breaking the law) may not be the car's owner, who is the one who receives the ticket in the mail. "Los Angeles County Superior Court officials ... said that for the last decade they have chosen a less forceful approach partly because the person receiving the ticket may not be the person who was driving the car," the Los Angeles Times reported. Last year it was revealed that payment for camera-enforced tickets in LA is voluntary. Only one-third of offenders reportedly pay up.
Critics of the technology say many of the cameras are installed at intersections considered likely to generate revenue rather than those in need of a boost in safety. Certainly, they do make money. The District of Columbia's existing cameras helped bring in $55.1 million in fines in 2011.
Camera use is up across the country. Speed cameras have been installed in 93 communities since 2005. But will it stay that way? New Jersey is conflicted on the topic; some municipalities continue to add cameras, but the state considered a law earlier this year to pull all of them down.
It may be a matter of time before more legislators and drivers adopt the mentality of New Jersey state Sen. Mike Doherty, a Republican, who sponsored that state's anti-camera bill. “The cameras are not about safety; they’re about generating revenue for municipalities,” Doherty said in an interview with The Daily Beast. “The towns are using their citizens as cash cows.”
I live in Huntsville, Alabama, where, at a cost of over a quarter million US, these blasted things have been installed at most intersections...but have never been turned on.
Every new intersection gets one, every new overpass...but they are not used.
They aren't dummies.
But ALADOT surely are.
They are installed much as the "SMART Electric Meters" are by local utilities: without advice from or consent of the citizens. Then their use is restricted while the legalities are sorted out. There was even one local survey by the city in which several of the cameras erroneoulsy identified traffic violations, citing the wrong car, the wrong offense, or taking a picture of no offense at all--even though the cameras are supposed to fire only if the signal is violated. PROTEST! If no one objects, our liberties vanish, one by one.
This what happens when you continuously elect idiots who know better than you what's good for you.
ATM cameras? Please, yes. Gas station cameras? Ditto. Banks? Wal-Mart parking lots? By all means--these cameras serve to provide safety for patrons and employees, not genrate revenue for municipalities too lazy or chintzy to even assign a cop to do the dirty work.
The only effective answer is a total ban on ticket cameras. People who don't wish to be revenue victims of predatory red light and speed cameras need to contact their state legislators to ask them to ban the cameras entirely, and contact their local officials to demand they not be used.
James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, Ann Arbor, MI
Studies show that intersection cameras cause more accidents than they prevent due to people locking up their brakes to avoid a ticket! I say ban them nationally.
Ever notice how the yellow light is just slightly shorter at these lights? I can't tell you how many rear-ends I've almost had for trying to obey the law. Lmao. All about safety clearly.
EXPLORE NEW CARS
MORE ON MSN AUTOS
ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES
Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.
Have a story idea? Tip us off at firstname.lastname@example.org.