NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

Quick Spin: 2013 Mercedes-Benz G-Class

Germany’s most comfortable people mover falls flat; by Kirk Bell

By Exhaust Notes Aug 15, 2012 8:04AM

Ahead of a full report, MSN Autos reviewers report to Exhaust Notes about their initial driving impressions in our Quick Spin segment. Here, Kirk Bell talks about Mercedes-Benz's go-anywhere 2013 G-Class SUV, which once again receives an evolutionary update rather than a full overhaul.


Photo by Mercedes-Benz.The Mercedes-Benz G-Class invites parallels with the Hummer H1 and the Jeep Wrangler. Like the H1, it was developed as a military vehicle and refitted for civilian use. Like the Wrangler, it was designed to be a go-anywhere, do-anything off-roader. It also shares the H1's sky-high pricing and the Wrangler's old-school design.

 

In fact, the G has never received a thorough exterior redesign. Instead, Mercedes has opted to continually update the interior appointments and powertrains, and that's exactly what the German luxury marque has done for the 2013 model year.

 

We drove the 2013 G-Class in the French Alps. Here are our initial thoughts.

 

Pros

Luxurious, hand-crafted interior: With pricing starting at more than $100,000, the G-Class had better have a quality interior -- and it does. It features high-grade materials and improved ergonomics, with the Comand central controller moved to the center console.

 

Power, and more power: The base 5.5-liter V8 engine in the G550 is strong and smooth, launching the vehicle from zero to 60 mph in 6 seconds. The G63 AMG's twin-turbocharged 5.5-liter V8 is even stronger, cutting that time to 5.3 seconds while making great noise.

 

Go-anywhere off-road ability: Standard front, center and rear locking differentials, low-range gearing, and short front and rear overhangs make the G-Class one of the best off-roaders on the planet. 


Photo by Mercedes-Benz. Cons

Bouncy ride and lots of body lean: The G-Class's 33-year old body-on-frame structure is tall and skinny, giving the vehicle sloppy handling, lots of body lean and a trucklike ride.

 

Gas guzzler: The base engine has been replaced in other Mercedes models because of poor fuel economy, and the twin-turbo V8, while more modern, is sure to get poor mileage as well, despite standard stop/start technology. Fuel-economy numbers aren't available, but they will certainly be low.

 

Poor value: With high pricing, sloppy handling, bad fuel economy and poor use of interior space, the G-Class doesn't offer anything save the Tristar badge that you can't get in a vehicle for $70,000 less.

8Comments
Aug 15, 2012 12:10PM
avatar
This thing is the epitome of having more money than brains.
Aug 15, 2012 8:22PM
avatar

I remember when Mercedes started (late 2002) to officially import the G-Class to the U.S.

 

There was a writer on MSN Autos several years ago who did the write up for the G-Class at the time.  Anyway, she listed under Pros, that she liked the off road capability, but turned around and complained under Cons about the truck like feel! Well duh!  IT IS a truck, but on a military truck platform with solid axles, hence the reason for the excellent off road capability!  Then she also listed under Cons that it looked like something out of the Cold War.  That's because..drum roll....IT IS!!

 

Apparently, Kirk Bell is just as clueless. 

 

Go-anywhere off-road ability: Standard front, center and rear locking differentials, low-range gearing, and short front and rear overhangs make the G-Class one of the best off-roaders on the planet.

 

Bouncy ride and lots of body lean: The G-Class's 33-year old body-on-frame structure is tall and skinny, giving the vehicle sloppy handling, lots of body lean and a trucklike ride.

 

Poor value: With high pricing, sloppy handling, bad fuel economy and poor use of interior space, the G-Class doesn't offer anything save the Tristar badge that you can't get in a vehicle for $70,000 less.

 

What does Krik expect? It's not a sports car.  Yet, just like the writer from years ago, he contradicts himself.  Kirk states that he likes the off road capability, but  then turns around and complains about the very thing that allows for the off road capability.  He also complains about the gas mileage.  Again, what the hell does he expect from a vehicle that has the aerodynamics of a brick, permanent 4WD, and weighs 5,578 lbs?  There is also a diesel variant that we can't get in the US.  For those who need off road capability, the G-Class is not of poor value.  I wonder if this genius realizes that the G-Class can climb 80% grades, remain stable laterally on grades of 54%, or the incredible reliability that they have.  As mentioned in my earlier post below, in 2006, Mercedes' engineers drove a G-Class 11,800 miles across Siberia in temperatures averaging -60 F. The number of break downs? ZERO. 

 

"the G-Class doesn't offer anything save the Tristar badge that you can't get in a vehicle for $70,000 less."

 

Krik, I hate to tell you, but actually it does.  How many other vehicles are on the road like the G-Class?  Oh right, none.  Yeah, there are other highend SUVs like the Range Rover and Land Cruiser, which are unique in their own right, but they're all different.  The G-Class is not for everyone, and Mercedes knows this. Just because it's not the right vehicle for you, that doesn't mean the value is poor. 

 

I have to agree with others, the MSN Autos writers are getting dumber, not smarter.

Aug 16, 2012 10:20AM
avatar

I'm no expert but it seems to me the majority of people who buy these are not concerned about driving dynamics or fuel economy.  They are more concerned about impressing others with their status symbols. 

 

Definition of Status:  Spending money you don't have on things you don't need in order to impess others you may not know or necessarily like. 

Aug 16, 2012 7:40AM
avatar

Steve-80:

 

I'm not jealous one bit.  I would never drive one of these douche mobiles if you paid me.  And not that it matters, but I've got a great career in oil and gas probably making more money than you're capable of counting.  If I had ANY desire to drive the Mercedes Milk Carton, I would.  But I'm not a pompus douche, so I wasn't able to meet the pre-qualifications for a test drive at the dealership.

 

I don't care if it can climb this grade and that grade and drive upside-down, the reality is that these lux'd up G-classes never leave pavement and should have stayed as millitary spec'd vehicles.

Aug 16, 2012 11:40AM
avatar

I've always liked the G Wagon.  I actually like the looks.  I appreciate the off road abilities and I am glad that the changes over the years have been slim.

 

However, it is definitely difficult to get around the fact that anyone who sits behind the wheel of one looks like a major tool.

Aug 22, 2012 9:37AM
avatar

Haha, I love it!  I just pulled this quote from the story about car's base price changes:

 

"Also in 2007, the ancient G550 (then called the G500) was less than $85,000. It’s now 30 grand more -- and all that cash just for a newer V8, a new tranny, some LEDs and other minor changes on a car dating back to the Cold War."

________________________________________

 

Even Mercedes knows the people who buy these things are so ignorant that they've instituted their own idiot tax to the tune of $30K in the last 5 years!

Aug 15, 2012 8:18AM
avatar
Cool because it is quirky but NOT over $100k cool by any stretch.
Aug 15, 2012 8:03PM
avatar

xquzit,

 

Awwwe, what's the matter, were you not able to land a career that pays well enough to where you can afford one?  Jealous much?  The G-Class is a vehicle that will last 30+ years if you take care of it, which means you don't have to go out and buy one every five years like most SUVS. In 2006, Mercedes' engineers drove a G-Class 11,800 miles across Siberia in temperatures averaging -60 F.  The number of break downs? ZERO.

The G-Class was released in 1979 for the German, Austrian, and Swiss militaries as well as NATO. Canadian Special Forces and U.S. Marines Force Recon use diesel military spec versions.

 

I've had numerous opportunities to drive the G-Class both on and off road through the years.  They're great vehicles. They have three locking differentials, and can climb 80% grades right out of the box with NO MODS.  The G-Class remains stable laterally at grades up to 54%.

 

Jeff,

 

The G-Class has always been a low production volume vehicle, and they're hand built in Graz, Austria by Magna Steyr (on Mercedes' behalf).  Thats the reason for the high cost, but again, this is a vehicle that will last 30+ years if you take care of it. You don't have to replace it every 5 to 10 years.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.