NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

California Attorney Rails Against Distracted-Driving Laws

He claims drivers' civil rights are being violated by police officers who use the laws as a pretext for making traffic stops.

By Claire_Martin Jun 1, 2012 1:54PM
Audi A6 photo by AudiDistracted-driving laws, which now exist in some states, are meant to curb drivers' urges to do things such as text, talk on the phone or eat while behind the wheel. But according to a California attorney, police are using them as a pretext for stopping and investigating drivers who aren't necessarily doing anything illegal.

"These laws give police officers yet another pretext to fabricate traffic stops," attorney Peter Johnson of the Walnut Creek firm Johnson & Johnson told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Reporting by the Chronicle shows that 68,000 distracted-driver citations were issued to Californians in April -- most for the infraction of texting while driving. But Johnson claims so-called "pretext stops" are a real issue and violate drivers' civil rights. 

"People are stopped every day for suspected cell phone use or other diversions and then subjected to interrogation for unrelated matters and to searches of their automobiles and of their person," Johnson said.

Not all states have distracted-driving laws on the books. Ten states, along with Washington, D.C., prohibit all hand-held cell-phone use; of those, nine allow police officers to stop drivers without any other traffic offense taking place. Thirty-nine states and Washington, D.C., ban text messaging while driving; all but four of those consider it a primary offense, not requiring another traffic infraction for enforcement.

Some local laws have also been passed regarding distracted driving, but several states prohibit localities from enacting such laws. All of which raises the question of whether there's any enforceable federal distracted driving legislation: Currently, the answer is no. 
3Comments
Jun 4, 2012 5:28AM
avatar
One can only hope that this moron gets involved in a head-on collision whith someone who was texting while "driving"!
Jun 4, 2012 12:40PM
avatar

I find CHP already almost useless, but if they can stop someone from killing you because they were texting there friend on where they should go to dinner then I'm for it.

Plus if a family member was ever killed by a distracted driver you would see him changing his tune real  quick. Come to think of it maybe someone in his family should be killed by some fool texting nonsense like most is, just stupid conversation mostly.

Jun 4, 2012 6:41AM
avatar

"these laws give officers yet another pretext to fabricate"...... really "Fabricate"

Carefully vague in not applying that statement to a specific officer or depratment, otherwise he could explore the meanings of "Slander".

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.