
Ford Debuts Start/Stop Feature on 2013 Fusion
The $295 option will be offered on the most fuel-efficient trim of the all-new Fusion.
Ford will offer an auto start/stop system as an option on the 2013 Fusion later this fall. The fuel-saving feature is popular in Europe and is just now beginning to appear on gasoline-powered U.S. models. While auto start/stop systems are nothing new -- during stops, they shut down the engine and quickly restart it when the brakes or clutch is released -- they've yet to catch on among nonhybrid cars in America. Ford is hoping at least some buyers will spend an extra $295 for it on the SE trim, the company's most popular -- and soon to be the most fuel-efficient nonhybrid Fusion on sale, featuring an estimated 37 mpg highway rating.
The automaker estimates city fuel economy will increase by up to 10 percent and overall economy by 3.5 percent compared with a Fusion without the system. The SE features a turbocharged version of the 1.6-liter 4-cylinder engine used in the subcompact Fiesta.
While official EPA numbers aren't out yet, we're betting the 2013 Fusion SE equipped with the auto start/stop feature will return 28 mpg city and a combined rating of 32 mpg, based on current ratings of the SE's 2.5-liter 4-cylinder and the Fiesta's naturally aspirated 1.6. Taking into account an average 15,000 miles per year, the EPA's standard weighting on combined fuel economy and Ford's own 3.5 percent estimate, the option should save most drivers just $66 per year in gas, at today's regular average of $3.93. That means that buying the almost $300 option will take about 4.5 years to pay you back at the pump.
However, that's just the average. If your commute involves more stop-and-go crawls, or you take plenty of city trips, the savings could be much greater -- and add up quicker. That's also not accounting for what this system could mean in savings when gas prices spike to the sky, as they last did in 2008.
But the relatively low cost and payback times aren't the real issue, Ford says. It's convincing nonhybrid buyers that their cars aren't stalling.
"Our biggest challenge will be getting costumers used to it. The idea of the engine stopping is a little uncomfortable to people," Ford spokesman Mark Schirmer says.
That's why so few automakers offer the feature on their regular U.S. models. Among those that do are the Porsche Panamera and Cayenne, the new BMW 3-Series and several Mercedes-Benz AMG models. On most of these cars, the start/stop system is off by default and has to be switched on by the driver -- a task that can be difficult to even notice, for example, on the Cayenne's button-crazy dashboard. Ford says that it will program the system to remain on at every engine start.
The company launched the auto start/stop system on European Focus models last year and will be adding the option to more 4-cylinder U.S. Fords such as the Fiesta and Focus soon, Schirmer says.
[Source: Ford]
Not saying the tech is bad, just that I don't want it and doubt that it will get much use from people.
I would feel somewhat vulnerable sitting in traffic without the power to react right away if need be.
Start up is instantaneous for most models. Most people wouldn't even know the difference.
How many traffic jams will be created when someone's car doesn't re start while sitting at a traffic light?
How many traffic jams are created when someone's car doesn't start while sitting at a traffic light without this technology? Considering that any and all technology will fail at some point in time doesn't not mean it shouldn't be used. Otherwise, you should never even sin in a car in the first place.
Just my opinion but I wouldn't want my vehicle turned off while I am sitting still.
But how will all these hybrid, start stop, touch screen, etc systems still be functioning when the car is long past warranty period?
An excellent point to ponder. As the vehicles get down to 3rd and 4th owners at the high schooler level, if the electronics begin failing there will likely be a new breed of DIY mechanic that can disable, replace or reroute electrical systems/components. Don't underestimate what todays/tomorrows kids could do with computers.
The worst period of time for engine wear is during start-up.
Not completely true. You should have added: "after the engine has been sitting for a long time." The reason that engine start up, after a long down time, is so hard on the engine is because most of the oil has drained to the oil pan and it has to be pumped back through the engine.
In the case of stop-start technology, the engine might shut off at a stop light while you wait for the green. This down time is so short, the oil doesn't have enough time to completely drain out of the engine. Engine damage is minimal if even existent. This technology has been around for a while now, and the automobiles that have been using it have not shown any significant signs of premature engine wear.
I personally welcome this type of technology so long as the additional cost will pay for itself in fuel savings over the life of the vehicle.
I agree with Had It.
You might save a few bucks on gas, but what's a new starter every few years going to cost? As well as the extra engine wear.
I've been wondering lately about the longevity of new cars lately. They're packed so full of electronics, will they still be running in 10, 15, or 20 years?
My 97 Grand Cherokee has 162k miles and is 15 years old. It runs great (original starter, btw), and I'm sure hitting 200k miles or another five years of life is not going to be a problem for it.
But how will all these hybrid, start stop, touch screen, etc systems still be functioning when the car is long past warranty period?
The worst period of time for engine wear is during start-up. I firmly believe that these start-stop systems will at least accelerate bearing wear as well as other items due to no oil flow. Since I keep my vehicles much longer than the average, I wouldn't buy anything which had this "feature" unless it could be completely defeated. The trivial amount of money saved on fuel will be completely overshadowed by the cost of an engine rebuild.
I don't know a lot about these types of systems, but wouldn't wear and tear on the starter be an issue?
I don't know how the Ford system works, but the GM eAssist system actually uses a very special alternator that doubles as a motor and turns over the motor through a drive belt when the engine is warm. The conventional starter is only used when the engine is cold.
EXPLORE NEW CARS
MORE ON MSN AUTOS
Strategic Vision releases its annual list of the highest-quality vehicles.
ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES
Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.
Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.

