NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

Chrysler agrees to recall 2.7 million Jeeps for fire hazards

After refusing a government request two weeks earlier, the automaker will conduct a recall but denies its vehicles are unsafe.

By Clifford Atiyeh 16 hours ago

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (© Chrysler Group, LLC)

Chrysler will recall 2.7 million vehicles for fire hazards after initially refusing to do so, the company said Tuesday afternoon.

 

"Chrysler Group’s analysis of the data confirms that these vehicles are not defective and are among the safest in the peer group," the company said in a statement. "Nonetheless, Chrysler Group recognizes that this matter has raised concerns for its customers and wants to take further steps, in coordination with NHTSA, to provide additional measures to supplement the safety of its vehicles."

 

Two weeks earlier, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requested the automaker recall the 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and the 2002-2007 Jeep Liberty for fuel tank leaks and fires related to rear-end collisions. At least 51 people have died in crashes where the vehicles ignited after being hit from behind, the federal agency said in an unusually detailed, 13-page report that tracked crash data from Chrysler and competitor vehicles. While the vehicles met all U.S. safety laws, NHTSA said that more drivers died from fuel-related fires in these Jeep models than in any competitor's models.

 

"The design defect is the placement of the fuel tanks in the position behind the axle and how they were positioned, including their height above the roadway," NHTSA said.

 

In total, 44 people died in 32 rear-end crashes that resulted in fires in 1993-2004 Grand Cherokee models, with seven fire-related fatalities from five rear-end crashes involving 2002-2007 Liberty models, NHTSA said. Twenty-seven fuel leaks in rear-end crashes that did not result in deaths were reported for both models.

 

Chrysler denied the report's calculations and said the vehicles had no safety problems. The deaths occurred less than once per million miles, which was below average among similar SUVs, Chrysler said on June 4.

 

However, NHTSA presented a different argument, claiming that only the Suzuki Sidekick, which was produced in small numbers and was discontinued in 1998, scored worse than the Jeep models in fire-related fatalities from rear-end collisions. In total, Chrysler made about 4 million Libertys and Grand Cherokees between 1993 and 2007.

 

Dealers will "provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle" to better protect the tank from leaking. An official recall date and schedule has not been announced.

 

Two days after Chrysler refused the recall request, it recalled 630,000 Jeeps to fix airbag deployment problems and transmission oil leaks.

 

In May, Chrysler recalled 469,027 2005-2010 Grand Cherokees and 2006-2010 Commanders that could inadvertently shift into neutral when the vehicle is started and cause the car to roll away.

 

In April, Chrysler recalled 30,000 Jeep Compass and Patriot SUVs from the 2012 and 2013 model years for fuel-tank transfer tubes that could starve the engine of gasoline.

 

In March and June of 2012, Chrysler recalled 347,000 Jeep Liberty SUVs from 2004-2007 for a rear lower control arm that could rust and fracture.

 

In November 2012, Chrysler recalled 744,822 Jeep Liberty and Grand Cherokee SUVs in the U.S. for airbags and seatbelt pre-tensioners that could inadvertently deploy or activate.

 

[Source: Chrysler]

18Comments
15 hours ago
avatar
So Chrysler blinked, I can't say I am surprised.  Still, I wish they had tried to argue the issue.  I personally think the government is in the wrong on this one.  The fact is that for better or worse it used to be standard practice to place the gas tank behind the rear axle.  The fuel tank is behind the rear axle on my '86 RX-7.  It was not against regulations to put it there at the time, and it passed safety requirements at the time.  I simply don't think it's a good idea to require cars to retroactively meet new safety requirements.  It used to be that new safety requirements were not mandated on existing cars.  For example, if your car was sold before seat belts were mandatory, you were excused from having them put in your car.  You were strongly recommended to seek a body shop to have them installed, but it was not mandatory.  This is new thinking on the part of the NHTSA and I really don't like where it's going.

11 hours ago
avatar
Ridiculous. 102 Jeeps MIGHT be affected out of 3 million. 102 of 3 million = .000034%. You have a better chance of being hit by lightning, abducted by aliens, or dying in a runaway Toyota than in a Jeep fire. 
12 hours ago
avatar
It certainly would seem to set a precedent for possibly recalling any vehicle from any manufacturer, seemingly regardless of age, due to a change in any safety standard. At the time of manufacture of the vehicles in question, they met or exceeded every Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard, as all vehicles sold in the U.S. are required to do. As for a vehicle being stationary on the side of a highway getting hit from behind by another vehicle which is travelling at a speed of 65-80+ miles per hour, there is not a vehicle made in the world that will not leak fuel under those circumstances. The majority of fires sustained in rear end collisisons actually begin in the striking vehicle. It's fuel system will spring a leak, and spray fuel on the hot engine or exhaust system, and it spreads rapidly to the fuel on the ground leaking out of the vehicle that has been struck.
6 hours ago
avatar

 It might just be me Frosty, but I feel you derive an almost perverse pleasure in seeing an American company having to recall a vehicle. Of course Toy has never (willingly) issued a recall.

 May I suggest you go and polish the wheel covers on your Toys?

13 hours ago
avatar
I own an 02 grand Cherokee and it will now have 3 different recalls on it and none have been fixed yet my wife called them about the airbag recall and they said we would get another notice when they had a fix for it, that was several months ago. would be hard to even give it away now but I will never buy a Chrysler product of any kind again
1 hour ago
avatar
they have ruined the jeep name and vehicles.owned one mopar in my life 1973 roadrunner.well and the 07 wrangler
1 hour ago
avatar
Chrysler sucks I bought an 07 wrangler first year of 4 door piece of crap. now mind you driving less than 3 months shifter came out in my hand within 4 months 5 recalls..
11 hours ago
avatar
I can't believe that now Chrysler agrees to the recall. But there is still a problem not solved. They want to add a trailer hitch beam to protect the exterior of the gas tank which is already protected by the steel frame of the vehicle. Believe me when I say this, "This isn't going to stop the vehicle from a punctured gas tank causing it to explode". If you notice the picture above has a 1993 to 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee with a trailer hitch in it. I would believe that the other Jeep GC's  also I assume had a trailer hitch under them. As for my vehicle I will stop driving it and will get rid of it. I'm not taking any risks. Chrysler needs to either replace the gas tank or replace our vehicles. Safety should be their number one concern not their profits.   (Picture of Grand Cherokee with hitch after it caught on fire on change.org) Please sign petition if you agree.
15 hours ago
avatar
" Chrysler group's analysis of the data confirms that these are not defective and are among the safest in the peer group".

  Tell that to the families of the 51 people that died as a result of the fires.

  Basically, the government bailed their asses out of trouble and now they are calling the government liars ( which we all know they often do about other issues). It's understandable that Chrysler does not want to deal with the situation since it will be very costly to add more structure to the rear end of almost 3 million vehicles.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
MSN Money

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.