NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

Electric Car Charging Can Create More Emissions Than Fueling

New study shows that in regions highly dependent on coal for electricity, plug-in vehicles are not always more green.

By Claire_Martin Apr 19, 2012 8:18AM
Chevrolet Volt photo by ChevroletEighteen percent of Americans live in regions where charging an electric vehicle like the Chevy Volt, which burns no gasoline, emits more global warming pollutants than some gasoline-fueled cars do, according to a new study by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). Whereas electric vehicles that are charged with renewable sources of energy, including wind and solar power, produce almost no global warming emissions, those charged on grids dependent on coal-burning power plants have much higher emissions. 

The worst region in the country for charging emissions? The Rockies. "The Rocky Mountain grid region (covering Colorado and parts of neighboring states) has the highest emissions intensity of any regional grid in the United States, which means an [electric vehicle] will produce global warming emissions equivalent to a gasoline vehicle achieving about 33 mpg," according to the study. "Gasoline-powered cars with fuel economy at this level include the Hyundai Elantra (33 mpg) and the Ford Fiesta (34 mpg)."

While charging in this region is still an improvement over the emissions generated by the majority of fuel-burning vehicles, it's not the zero-emissions equation most people think they're signing up for when they buy an electric vehicle. 

"This will certainly make it clear that even with no tailpipe emissions, there are emissions associated with charging [an electric vehicle]," Don Anair, one of the UCS researchers, told the Detroit Free Press.  

The good news is that electric vehicles do minimize emissions in most of the country. On the coasts, where grid energy is cleanest, charging an electric vehicle produces emissions equivalent to a gasoline-burning vehicle that gets as much as 50 miles per gallon. In Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Florida and parts of the South and Midwest, that number drops to 41 to 50 miles per gallon -- similar to what hybrids achieve. In most of the Midwest, the average is 31 to 40 miles per gallon. 

Cutting back further on emissions will require a larger effort, according the UCS study: "[Our] nation’s reliance on coal-powered electricity limits electric vehicles from delivering their full potential," UCS researchers wrote. "Only by making improvements to our electricity  grid—by decreasing the use of coal and increasing the use of clean and renewable sources of electricity—will electric vehicles deliver their greatest global warming and air pollution benefits."
17Comments
Apr 19, 2012 5:23PM
avatar

It would be nice to know how much the Oil companys payed them

for this study.

Apr 19, 2012 4:00PM
avatar
Just wondering  does this method of converting emissions used to generate electricity to charge an electric vehicle to MPG really makes that much sense? Using there thinking,  a  gas-only powered vehicle(Fiesta, Elantra, etc) operates on gasoline that also has additional emissions related to drilling, shipping the oil to refineries, and then trucking the fuel  to gas stations(many additional sources of emissions I surely missed) and thus would have a far worse "MPG equivalent" rating.
Apr 19, 2012 12:33PM
avatar
Electrics are just another indication of the "green" myth to go along with global warming.  What is it about our government over the last 40 years where the solution is often worse than the problem it was supposed to solve.  MBTE and corn-based Ethanol come to mind.
Apr 19, 2012 9:54AM
avatar
i was sort of exaggerating on that figure.lol.Embarrassed
Apr 19, 2012 9:04AM
avatar

don't forget to pay your one thousand dollars per year for road and highway upkeep that you are not paying at the pump!

You might want to double check that number.  Last year I paid less then $300 for road and highway upkeep through taxes at the pump.  And I drove more then 30k miles last year.

Apr 19, 2012 8:48AM
avatar

i agree 100%. then there is always nuclear power plants (you know the trade off with nuclear fuels).

don't forget to pay your one thousand dollars per year for road and highway upkeep that you are not paying at the pump!

Apr 19, 2012 8:47AM
avatar

Strange.  Just the other day, on this same website, I read an article explaining how plug-in vehicles are greener then their gasoline counterparts in all parts of the country, including the coal powered areas. 

 

Different studies produce different results.  I would be willing to be that in both cases, the studies discovered what they WANTED to discover in the first place.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
MSN Money

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.