NewUsed

Find by category:

Exhaust Notes

San Francisco Area Officials Considering Per-Mile Driving Tax

Proposal would charge drivers based on how far they travel and track them with GPS devices.

By Douglas Newcomb Jul 24, 2012 11:33AM

Golden Gate Bridge photo by Flikr user omninate.The downside of fuel efficiency: Going farther on a gallon of gas means less money going into local and state coffers in the form of fuel taxes to fund transportation infrastructure, such as roads and bridges. While gas taxes have worked for decades as the most efficient way to spread the pain by making drivers pay at the pump, more fuel-efficient vehicles combined with fewer miles driven overall have caused transportation officials to seek more creative ways to reap revenue, such as converting interstate highways to toll roads.


The always forward-thinking and environmentally conscious Californians in the San Francisco Bay Area have come up with a novel way to raise money for roads and public transportation, while also potentially reducing traffic and automobile emissions: charging motorists a tax for every mile they drive. Members of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments recently authorized a study of a possible vehicle-miles-traveled tax as part of a larger environmental review of transportation options for the area.


Under the proposal, drivers in the nine-county Bay Area would be required to install GPS-like odometers or other devices in their vehicles, and would pay anywhere from less than a penny to as much as a dime for every mile driven. Based on current Bay Area driving patterns, such a mileage tax could raise up to $15 million every day.


But the idea could take a decade or more before it’s launched. Metropolitan Transportation Commission spokesman Randy Rentschler acknowledged that the concept could prove tough even for the notoriously liberal Bay Area residents to swallow, and that they would likely reject the idea of both the travel tax and the government-mandated tracking devices.


“The last thing we're interested in is where you go and what you do,” Rentschler said, according to the San Jose Mercury News. “What we're trying to do is get people to figure out a way to raise revenue that they could support.” And since San Francisco likes to consider itself one of the most European of U.S. cities, maybe the residents would feel comforted by the fact that a survey last year by the European Commission found that a majority of Europeans would be happy to pay higher taxes for driving more, as opposed to the current flat-rate registration and road tax. And many European Union countries also include in their car tax system a charge for carbon-dioxide emissions per kilometer traveled.


The Mercury News pointed out that pilot studies of mileage taxes have been conducted in Atlanta and also in several communities in Oregon and Washington. Drivers in those studies logged fewer miles when they were given a sum of money and then had amounts deducted based on how much they drove.


[Source: Autoblog.]

260Comments
Jul 24, 2012 12:53PM
avatar

The state of CA sells over 1 billion (yes BILLION) gallons of motor fuel each MONTH.  And it is taxed at about 70 cents per gallon.  That's 8.4+ BILLION dollars a year.

 

Since our roads are degrading daily, one has to ask where is all that money going?

Jul 28, 2012 2:34AM
avatar
ENOUGH   IS   ENOUGH !!!

I want the People of America to DEMAND a:  POLITICIAN TAX

Politicians are the ones who want to figure out a way to raise revenue, then THEY should be happy to pay higher taxes for the privilege, as opposed to paying the current rate the REST of the citizens pay.
Their PAY scale should also be based on Political Performance, which would raise and lower depending of public opinion... IF their public confidence lowers 42%, so does their pay!!

Jul 24, 2012 3:45PM
avatar

“The state mandated GPS unit hard wired into your car reports you visited a gun show this weekend, therefore we have probable cause to make a felony car stop and tear apart your car searching for illegal firearms” or “Your car was tracked to a liquor store just now, you needed to be stopped to check and see if you’re driving drunk.” You think that would not happen? We are talking about the most liberal nanny state city on the west coast here.

Jul 28, 2012 11:46AM
avatar

That is the dumbest idea ever.  I'm sorry your tax coffers are no longer bursting at the seams.  Here's a thought, instead of just finding another way to bleed your citizens, why not act like a business or indivudual and find a way to reduce spending and generate/increase revenue. If the only income you generate is from one source, (in this case taxes), than you are running a really poor business.  Why not invest some of your money and use the interest to pay for things.  Issue a loan to business that build infastructure in you area.  Stop thinking taxes and only taxes are your savior. 

 

 

  

Jul 24, 2012 4:17PM
avatar
People of San Francisco...don't let them do this to you...don't let them set this kind of precedent. This is govt, oppression and violation of your rights. DON"T let them "sugar coat" this like MSN is trying to do here!
Jul 24, 2012 6:18PM
avatar
" drivers in the nine-county Bay Area would be required to install GPS-like odometers or other devices in their vehicles..."

Not a chance in he!! I would ever allow the government to put one of those in any vehicle I own. 
Jul 28, 2012 5:21AM
avatar
I don't know about the rest of you but I don't like being tracked where I go where I shop where I eat where my friends live,relatives, etc., etc., wake up America.
Jul 25, 2012 6:56AM
avatar
There are so many things wrong with this. First off, it is a violation of a persons right to privacy to install GPS devices on someone's vehicle in order for the government to track your movements, some of you may have heard of this, it is called the fourth amendment. And while many have been willing to sacrifice this right for what they see as the "greater good", this is a very slippery slope which will only further erode other rights we hold dear as citizens of this country. Secondly, I want to know why the citizens of this country are being forced to cut back and make decisions like buying fuel efficient hybrid cars and the government and it's spending are ridiculously out of control. I think it may be time for our political leaders to start tightening the belt a bit as those they "represent" have been forced to do. I'm sure there is plenty of BS spending out there that can be reallocated toward road repairs. Just a thought. 
Jul 28, 2012 3:51AM
avatar
I thought the whole idea behind better fuel efficiency was to reduce fuel consumption thus produceing less emissions/polution. But since the goal of this suggested tax is to raise money for road repair, why stop with just this tax. After all car pooling was another method used to reduce problems so why not charge a per-person tax on vehicals. Also what about walkers, joggers, runners, and bicyclist. They use the public infrestructures too. Infact they are the bigger problem because they are useing even less fuel than the people who drive fuel-efficient cars. Lets charge them an even larger tax. On top of the road-use tax, lets charge them an excise tax on their footwear. Just like the one we pay on our cars, and maybe even require them to pay for a state inspection. After all every one knows from all the informercials that proper foot-wear is important. We wouldn't want anyone suffering an injury on our streets because they weren't wearing the right shoes, or shoes that were wore out beyond state mandated guidelines. There are so many tax possiblities that the governments just aren't utilizeing yet. Its a wonder the deficets aren't getting larger.
Jul 25, 2012 6:03AM
avatar
Great. Leave it to the People's Republic of San Francisco to come up with a plan that allows the government to track citizen's movements, while picking their pockets clean.

This is a modern - day version of, "Let me see your papers," spoken by government officials on the streets of Berlin in the 30's and 40's.

The media went along with everything the government did there, and our media today is equally spineless. A majority of Europeans would be "happy" to pay higher taxes? That must be why they're so happy to pay $8 for a gallon of gas. Goody for them, but this is, or used to be, America, a country founded on tax revolt and limited government.

Unfortunately, today it is seen as nothing more than a laboratory for social engineers to restructure our society into a more "fair" (read: Marxist) model.  

Democracy 101: We are not a free society if we are required to report our daily comings and goings to the government. 
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

ABOUT EXHAUST NOTES

Cars are cool, and here at MSN Autos we love everything about them, but we also know they're more than simply speed and style: a car is an essential tool, a much-needed accessory to help you get through your day-to-day life. What you drive is also one of the most important investments you can make, so we'll help you navigate your way through the car buying and ownership experiences. We strive to be your daily destination for news, notes, tips and tricks from across the automotive world. So whether it's through original content from our world-class journalists or the latest buzz from the far corners of the Web, Exhaust Notes helps you make sense of your automotive world.

Have a story idea? Tip us off at exhaustnotes@live.com.